We're currently working on an animation to show how a client's product reconstructs bones. Here are a few stills from that animation.
This is a project we're really excited to be working on. We're developing the software for Fitnexx's Fit4Class. Fit4Class is a Kinect game to be played in schools by K-5 students. The video below is an early graphics test for an obstacle course in the game.
Full environment yet to be built... This is just a quick demo video we made of testing what we've got working so far.
We're expecting to have this game out for free for Google Cardboard (for both iOS/Android) later this year!
Virtual Reality demo coming soon for Google Cardboard on iOS and Android!
We recently developed an interactive power plant computer application for one of our clients. They are using it to educate their customers and employees on where and how one of their products works. Above is a video walkthrough of the application.
Choosing Computer Hardware and Optional Hardware
As we mentioned before in Part 1, the hardware requirements for virtual reality are pretty steep. Most classrooms in both schools and corporate environments are not outfitted with adequate hardware to run VR.
As of right now, the cheapest options retail for around $800 per PC. There are a handful of laptops that are ready for VR, and the starting prices for those are at around $1150 per machine.
These are just a fraction of the options for PCs that are on the market now. They’re labeled as “Vive ready” or Oculus ready” but in reality, these machines will (in most cases) work for either headset.
You also have the option of building your own. Here are links to a couple of guides.
While there aren’t many laptops out there that can handle virtual reality right now, this article does provide some good suggestions.
The Kinect is a full body motion tracker. It’s perfect for fitness applications and other real world scenarios where physical tasks are a large part of the training experience.
The Virtuix Omni is a 360 rotational treadmill. This piece of hardware is exceptionally useful when moving through areas is a significant part of the training process.
The Leap Motion is a small device that can be mounted to a head-mounted display. The device tracks hand motions, and can be used for more realistic training when physical tasks are performed.
With so many different VR options hitting the market these days, it may seem like a daunting task to even get started outfitting your classroom(s) with this new technology. In this series, we’re going to walk through the all the steps you’ll need to take from choosing the right headset for your environment to setting up your VR station!
The first decision to make is “which head-mounted display do I want to invest in?” In this article, I’m only going to touch on the major 2 desktop options out there- the Oculus Rift and the HTC Vive. Both are excellent choices, but do vary in some significant ways.
While this is definitely not a comprehensive list, it does highlight key features and drawbacks for each option.
The first consumer version of the Oculus Rift hit the market in Q1 of 2016, and has been wildly popular.
-Positional Tracking is done using sensors on the headgear+a base station that is typically placed on a desk.
-Each Rift comes with an Xbox One controller.
-Oculus Touch, motion tracking hand controllers with buttons, will also be available to purchase sometime in 2016.
-Starting price of $600, making it $200 cheaper than the Vive.
-At the time of writing this article, Oculus Touch is not available yet, leaving users with less options for user input controls.
-Built to be more of a seated VR experience. Because of the way the positional tracking works, you’re not really meant to get up and move around without some extra hardware.
-Because of the included handheld controllers and positional tracking system, the Vive is a truly immersive VR system out of the box. You have the ability to stand and move through VR environments.
-Slightly more flexible graphics card options than the Rift.
-$800 price point, making it $200 more expensive than the Rift
-While standing to play is super immersive, the headset is still wired, making it somewhat hazardous to play.
From an education and training perspective, the biggest deciding factor is probably going to be one of space. The Vive requires a bit more space, with more specific location requirements for its positional tracking. This also means that in smaller spaces, you’ll have less flexibility for multiple VR stations within the same classroom. You’ll need to consider how important full, standing immersion is compared to the need for multiple stations in your space as you’re making your decision.
At the time of publishing this article, neither the Rift or the Vive support Macs. Both headsets also have fairly beefy computer requirements. For a comprehensive hardware spec comparison, here’s a great article. Our next post will talk a little more in depth about computer options.
We recently completed a virtual reality tour for a beautiful home designed by Magnolia Homes. The real beauty of the project is in the fact that we were able to create the entire home in 3D using only blueprints. When we started the project, the home had never been built in the real world. Magnolia Homes wanted a way to show off their new floor plan before they were able to begin construction.